Mon–Sat 08:30–18:00 / +971 6 767 2469 / sales@mfindllc.com
MF FASTENER INDUSTRIES LLC
Emirates Modern Industrial Area, Umm Al Quwain, U.A.E. · P.O. Box 7071 · ISO 9001:2015 · Technical Library
TECHNICAL LIBRARY

How to read a mill test certificate

Bolt Lab · 09 · the MTC · EN 10204 · ISO 898-1

A test certificate is the only thing that ties the bolt in your hand to a batch of steel that was actually tested. Most people file it without reading it. Click any part of the sample certificate to see what that field is telling you, what the standard requires it to say, and what a bad one looks like. The certificate below is a sample with illustrative values — it is not a real document.

SAMPLE · ILLUSTRATIVE VALUES
01

Inspection certificate 3.1 · EN 10204:2004

Certificate No. IC-26-04417 · Date 12-Sep-2026
02Purchaser: [customer] · PO 4471-B · Item 3
Product: Hex bolt ISO 4014 · M20 × 100 · property class 8.8 · hot-dip galvanized ISO 10684 · Qty 1 200 pcs
Specification: ISO 898-1:2013 · ISO 4014 · ISO 10684
03Heat No. 7A3392 · Lot No. L-2609-014 · Steel: 35CrMo (EN 10083) · Mill cert ref. STM-26-1180
04Chemical composition, cast analysis (%)
CSiMnPSCrMoB
0.360.240.720.0140.0090.980.19<0.0005
ISO 898-1 cl. 8.8: C 0.25–0.55 · P ≤ 0.025 · S ≤ 0.025 · B ≤ 0.003
05Mechanical properties — machined test piece and full-size wedge test
Rm MPaRp0.2 MPaA %Z %Proof load kNWedge test
89675215.554147.0 · heldFracture in shank · pass
Required, d > 16: Rm ≥ 830 · Rp0.2 ≥ 660 · A ≥ 12 · proof 147.0 kN (600 MPa × 245 mm²)
06Hardness: 288 · 291 · 285 HV10 (core) · surface HV0.3 not more than 30 points above core · Required 255–335 HV
07Heat treatment: quenched and tempered · austenitised 860 °C, oil quench · tempered 480 °C · ISO 898-1 minimum tempering 425 °C
08Coating: hot-dip spun galvanized ISO 10684 · local 52 µm, mean 61 µm (min 40 / 50) · nuts tapped oversize 6AZ after coating · embrittlement relief per ISO 10684 cl. 5
09Marking: manufacturer's identification mark and property class 8.8 on head · nuts marked 8Z · thread 6g before coating
10
Manufacturer's authorised inspection representative
(independent of production)
[name] · QA/QC · signed · stamped
Purchaser's representative / third party
not required for 3.1

Values on the sample are illustrative and were chosen to comply with ISO 898-1 class 8.8 above M16. Field order, headings and layout vary between manufacturers; the content required does not.

Which certificate you have, and which you should ask for

EN 10204 typeWhat it isWho signsTested on your batch?
2.1 Declaration of complianceA statement that the goods meet the order. No test results.ManufacturerNo
2.2 Test reportResults from non-specific inspection — the manufacturer's usual production, not necessarily this heat.ManufacturerNot necessarily
3.1 Inspection certificateResults from specific inspection of the actual products or test units of the batch supplied.Manufacturer's authorised inspection representative, independent of the production departmentYes
3.2 Inspection certificateAs 3.1, additionally witnessed and countersigned.Manufacturer's independent representative and the purchaser's representative or an official inspectorYes, witnessed

For structural and pressure work, 3.1 is the working minimum. A 2.2 is not a certificate for your bolts; it is a description of the factory. Ask for 3.2 where the specification, the client or the regulator requires third-party witnessing. EN 10204 also allows a manufacturer to transfer results from the incoming bar's own 3.1 onto its certificate, provided traceability is maintained — which is exactly how an anchor bolt certificate from MF carries the bar mill's heat analysis.

The five things that fail a certificate. No heat number, or a heat number that does not match the bar or the bag. Results that are exactly the minimum, line after line — real test results scatter. A hardness reading with no test method or load. A certificate signed by the production manager, which fails the independence requirement of 3.1. And the one we see most: a certificate for the right grade and the wrong size, where the values are correct for M16 and below but the bolts are M20.

Questions we are asked

The tensile figure is above the maximum — is that a problem?

ISO 898-1 sets minimums for tensile and yield, not maximums, so a high Rm is not a non-conformance in itself. What it sets both ways is hardness: 255–335 HV for 8.8 above M16. A tensile result that looks too good for the class, alongside a hardness at the top of the band, is worth a second look — an over-hardened 8.8 loses ductility, and the elongation and wedge test results are where that shows.

What is the wedge test and why does it matter more than the tensile?

A full-size bolt is pulled to failure with a wedge of a specified angle under the head, so the head is loaded off-axis. The bolt must fail in the shank or the thread, never at the head-to-shank junction. It is the test that catches a poorly formed head radius or a hardened, brittle head — the machined tensile test piece tells you about the steel; the wedge test tells you about the bolt.

Does a galvanized bolt need anything extra on the certificate?

Three things: the coating thickness, local and mean, against the ISO 1461 or ISO 10684 minimum; confirmation the nuts were tapped oversize after galvanizing and are marked Z or X; and, for class 8.8 and above, that the embrittlement relief the coater is required to manage was carried out. A bolt certificate that ends at the mechanical properties is only half a certificate for a galvanized product.

Can I accept a certificate that references a different edition of the standard?

Only with care. ISO 898-1:2013 tightened the phosphorus and sulphur limits from 0.035 to 0.025 for the quenched-and-tempered classes, among other changes. A certificate quoting the 1999 edition may be reporting compliance with the looser limits. Check the edition on the certificate against the one your specification calls for, and read the actual numbers rather than the word "conforms".

Related

Inspecting a delivery · Head markings chart · Galvanizing & thread fit · Back to the Bolt Lab